VIDEO DETAILS
Market Outlook for June 8, 2025 - what job strength?
✓ FREE ACCESS
Market Outlook for June 8, 2025: Unmasking Job Market Fragility and AI's Looming Shadow
The latest market rally, fueled by ostensibly strong job numbers, appears to be built on a statistical house of cards, masking a stagnant U.S. economy. This misinterpretation, coupled with the Federal Reserve's potential policy error and the unacknowledged deflationary impact of AI-driven job displacement, sets the stage for significant market recalibration.
Key Insights
1. The Illusion of Job Strength: A Statistical Deep Dive Reveals Stagnation
The analyst presented a meticulous deconstruction of the recent U.S. jobs report, arguing that the headline figures obscure underlying weakness and statistical insignificance. The market's enthusiastic rally to push the S&P 500 towards 6,000 on the back of these numbers is, therefore, fundamentally misguided.
"Taken all in all, it is difficult statistically to conclude that this economy is creating jobs."
Delving into the Household Survey, the analyst highlighted a significant decrease in the labor force by 625,000, a drop in the participation rate by 0.2%, and a fall in employment by 700,000. Full-time jobs plummeted by 623,000, while part-time jobs saw a meager uptick. Critically, job losses were observed across all major age cohorts and most educational attainment levels, with jobs for BA holders remaining flat. The analyst emphasized that with a standard error of +/- 300,000, the household survey confidently indicates net job losses.
The Establishment Survey, despite a headline print of 139,000 jobs created (beating an expectation of 125,000), also came under scrutiny. March's reported 185,000 was revised down to 120,000, and April's 177,000 to 147,000. The analyst pointed out that the published standard error of 136,000 for the establishment survey is likely understated due to a significant drop in response rates (from typical levels to around 40%). Adjusting for this, the actual standard error could be closer to 150,000-160,000. This wider error margin means that the job creation numbers for March, April, and May are not statistically distinguishable from zero with 90% confidence. Furthermore, the Diffusion Index for total private industries fell to 50.0 in May, indicating neither expansion nor contraction – essentially zero net job growth across industries. Manufacturing's diffusion index was a "wickedly low" 41.7.
Actionable Takeaway: Investors should look beyond headline job numbers and critically assess underlying data, revisions, and statistical confidence intervals. The current labor market data suggests economic stagnation or even contraction, contrary to the narrative driving the equity rally.
2. The Fed's Looming Policy Error: Ignoring Clear Signals for Imminent Rate Cuts
The analyst argued forcefully that the Federal Reserve has not only the permission but a compelling need to cut interest rates immediately, and that failing to do so will be a significant policy mistake. This view is based on recent benign inflation data, the true weakness in the labor market, and rising job cut announcements.
"Not only permission to cut, they should be cutting at this point in time... If they're going to meet the economy where it's going to be in six months or one year, you would be cutting now... I think that is going to be, it'll be looked back at as a big mistake."
The analyst pointed to two consecutive months of favorable CPI and PCE inflation readings, which, if annualized, would fall below the Fed's target. Combined with elevated initial jobless claims and Challenger job cuts (up 80% year-over-year for January-May, totaling 700,000 cuts), the economic picture justifies a dovish pivot. The analyst believes the Fed leadership is "smart enough to recognize that this is a statistical output" and should see that job creation has been negligible since January. A 25 basis point cut is seen as a "no brainer," while a 50 basis point cut would be "courageous" but appropriate if the Fed is truly forward-looking.
The market, however, is pricing in a 97.4% probability of no cut at the next meeting. The analyst views this as a misjudgment and has personally taken long positions in Fed Funds futures (January and May contracts, totaling over 30 contracts) in anticipation of eventual rate cuts. If the Fed does cut, the analyst expects a rapid repricing in the yield curve, benefiting these positions and potentially causing the long end of the curve to come down.
Actionable Takeaway: The Fed's current stance may be a policy error. Investors might consider strategies that benefit from falling interest rates, such as long-duration bonds or specific rate-sensitive equities, if they share the analyst's view on impending cuts. The analyst's own positioning in Fed Funds futures underscores this conviction.
3. AI: The Unacknowledged Job Destroyer and Deflationary Force
A significant portion of the analysis was dedicated to the transformative and often underestimated impact of Artificial Intelligence on the labor market and broader economy. The analyst contends that AI is already causing significant job displacement and will act as a powerful deflationary force, a reality largely ignored by policymakers and market participants.
"This is deflationary and it's not just industry specific, it is economy generalized. To say there'll be no job losses to say that this is not deflationary is to ignore all the history of technological evolution..."
The analyst provided concrete examples of companies cutting jobs or freezing hiring due to AI:
- Klarna: 40% headcount cut due to AI and attrition; AI doing the work of 700 customer service agents.
- Shopify: CEO demanding justification for why tasks can't be done by AI before hiring.
- CrowdStrike: Cut 5% of staff, citing AI reshaping the industry.
- Chegg: Cut 22% of workforce as AI tools like ChatGPT take over education services.
- IBM: 8,000 jobs, many in HR, replaced by AI.
- Google: Contemplating up to 30,000 job cuts, exploring AI for ad sales and customer support automation. The analyst, drawing on PhD research into technological innovation, emphasized that current AI (especially LLMs) is evolving at an unprecedented speed. Unlike previous technologies that augmented human labor, this AI can replace human cognitive tasks, particularly in entry-level roles, coding, and education. This makes it inherently job-displacing and deflationary. The analyst also shared a personal anecdote: "Earlier in the year I was saying, look, I could hire five people easily... No, I don't need to hire anyone. I can increase that output and better output than I thought I could get without people."
Actionable Takeaway: The deflationary impact of AI and its potential for widespread job displacement are underappreciated risks. Investors should reassess long-term growth and inflation assumptions and consider the vulnerability of various sectors to AI-driven disruption. The "Today plan" approach is advocated, as five-year plans are becoming obsolete due to AI's rapid evolution.
4. Market Overvaluation and Complacency Amidst Rising Risks
The analyst expressed strong skepticism about current equity market valuations, particularly the S&P 500 trading at 22.25 times forward earnings (with SPX at 6000 and forward four-quarter operating earnings at $269.65). This valuation is occurring against a backdrop of questionable economic data, significant geopolitical uncertainty, and "leadership that is volatility itself."
"It seems that the market wants to go up for no other reason than to go up that it doesn't, it does not appear to be fundamentally supported."
A key concern is the extremely low level of implied volatility, with the options market pricing in the "lowest level of expected volatility in the last quarter." This complacency is seen as dangerous given the stagnant, if not shrinking, economy revealed by a deeper data dive, and the potential for political volatility to impact markets. The analyst finds it a "head scratcher" that the market continues to rally, shrugging off negative data and "looking past" current issues towards an entirely "made up" future.
The political dimension, particularly involving former President Trump, was highlighted as a source of volatility. The analyst discussed Trump's calls for aggressive Fed rate cuts ("Go for a full point"), his administration's upcoming trade talks with China, and the public feud with Elon Musk. The analyst believes Musk will face "very serious consequences" from Trump, potentially impacting Tesla (TSLA), and mentioned selling June 13 $302.50 calls on TSLA. This political uncertainty, combined with economic fragility, makes the current low-volatility environment and high valuations particularly precarious.
Actionable Takeaway: Current market valuations appear stretched and disconnected from underlying economic realities and rising risks. Investors should exercise caution, consider hedging strategies, and be wary of the prevailing complacency indicated by low implied volatility. The analyst is short the S&P 500 (SPY) and long small caps (IWM, IJR) on a relative basis, though with net positive beta.
5. Commodities Shine: Copper as the "Single Best Bet," Gold's Enduring Appeal
Amidst concerns about the broader economy and equity markets, the analyst identified significant opportunities in commodities, particularly copper and gold. These assets are favored due to fundamental supply/demand dynamics, potential U.S. dollar weakness, and their role in global infrastructure and energy transition.
"If, if I had to put all my money into one thing and one thing only for five years and not touch it for five years, hands down it would be copper."
Copper is lauded for its essential role in energy movement and infrastructure, including AI's physical manifestation. The analyst anticipates $7-$9 copper by 2030 (currently around $4.80-$4.83/lb) and plans to "get very aggressive on any pullback below $4.50-$4.55." The recent peak near $5.32/lb followed by a pullback is seen as a consolidation before an inevitable breakout. Year-to-date, copper is up 17%.
Gold is also viewed bullishly, with the analyst seeing targets of $4,000-$6,000 per ounce as inevitable, potentially reaching $15,000 by 2035. Gold is up 23% year-to-date. The analyst prefers direct commodity exposure (e.g., futures) over mining stocks like Newmont (up 42% YTD) or Freeport-McMoRan (up 10% YTD), despite their leverage, to avoid company-specific risks. Both gold and copper have outperformed Bitcoin year-to-date and over the last three years, challenging the narrative of Bitcoin as a superior alternative asset.
Actionable Takeaway: Investors seeking diversification and growth potential in a challenging macroeconomic environment should consider allocations to copper and gold. The analyst's strong conviction in copper, particularly on price dips, suggests a long-term strategic holding. Anticipated U.S. dollar weakness over the next 12-24 months could further boost commodity prices.
Insightful Quotes
-
"Taken all in all, it is difficult statistically to conclude that this economy is creating jobs."
-
"This is deflationary and it's not just industry specific, it is economy generalized. To say there'll be no job losses to say that this is not deflationary is to ignore all the history of technological evolution... Put your head in the sand and say no, no, no, no, no."
-
"It seems that the market wants to go up for no other reason than to go up that it doesn't, it does not appear to be fundamentally supported."
Market Implications
The analyst's comprehensive outlook points to a U.S. market environment fraught with misinterpretations and underappreciated risks. The prevailing narrative of robust job growth appears to be a statistical fallacy, masking an economy that is, at best, stagnant. This disconnect suggests the recent equity market rally is fragile and vulnerable to a correction as reality sets in.
Investment Strategies & Considerations:
- Skepticism Towards Equities: The high valuations (S&P 500 at 22.25x forward P/E) are unjustified given the weak underlying economic data and the deflationary headwinds from AI. The analyst is short SPY and suggests caution.
- Anticipate Fed Easing: Contrary to current market pricing, the Fed has strong reasons to cut rates. This could lead to a rally in bonds (the analyst bought TLT after Friday's sell-off) and benefit rate-sensitive assets. The analyst is positioned for this via Fed Funds futures.
- Long Commodities: Copper and gold are highlighted as strong long-term investments. Copper, in particular, is termed the "single best bet" for the next five years due to structural demand.
- AI Disruption Awareness: The job-displacing and deflationary effects of AI are a major theme. Investors should be wary of industries and companies heavily reliant on roles susceptible to automation and consider the broader deflationary pressure on corporate earnings and economic growth.
- Volatility Undervalued: Current low implied volatility (VIX) is seen as a mispricing of risk, especially given the political climate ("leadership that is volatility itself") and economic uncertainties. Strategies that benefit from rising volatility could be considered.
- Political Risk Monitoring: The analyst dedicates significant attention to political developments, particularly involving former President Trump, and their potential market impacts (e.g., on Tesla due to the Musk feud, trade policy with China). This underscores the need for investors to factor in heightened political risk.
Overall, the outlook is one of caution for broad equity markets, with a call to look beyond superficial data and narratives. Opportunities exist but require a contrarian stance and a deep understanding of underlying statistical realities and transformative technological trends like AI.